![]() ![]() I am familiar with purse dot io, but have never used it. But again, that seems like something that could have been done after an initial XMR port was completed. it seemingly only ever complicated things. I understand that another thing they are doing is removing the bisq DAO and BSQ, which I support. (yeah, the old UI kinda sucks, but seemingly a replacement could be done as a later, independent feature). That is a non-trivial task, and I may be underestimating, but I don't see why it is taking as long as it is, and also why it was decided to create an entirely new UI. So that layer would need to be replaced to speak to Monero blockchain. I think they may be trying to do too much, with a new UI, etc.įor a bitcoin clone such as LTC, one could simply fork bisq, and change the blockchain params, string replace BTC->LTC and away you go.įor Monero, it is more complicated because bisq uses bitcoinj library (still true?) which can only speak to bitcoin type blockchains. It's unclear to me why haveno is taking as long as it is. I don't think anyone has really tried this laissez faire + ratings + filters approach yet. I believe it could be done effectively without JS using only CSS.Īnyway, I just throw that out as food for thought, as there is a lot of debate about censorship and moderation these days. I envision the rating UI as a popup menu when you hover over a comment. (by default, unrated content would not appear.) But individuals could tweak the filters however they wish, including to view unrated content, and then save filter templates for others to use as well. A default filter might show only content that has been rated "not spam, not adult, not hate speech". With these ratings in place, a filter system could be devised. Such as: agreement (agree/disagree), quality, grammar, humor, hate speech, adult/nsfw, spam, on/off topic, etc. So I envision a system that includes an extensible list of rating criteria. For example a comment may be very well written, but I disagree with the premise. Most sites allow simple up/down voting, or even just a "like" button. Allow all comments to be posted and to remain, but enable users to rate comments with much greater granularity, and present a site that is suitable for everyone (eg children) by default. Sort of the big picture idea is to avoid censorship entirely. I've long thought that there is room for substantial improvement in these systems. How about ratings and content moderation? Does it have the equivalent of sub-reddits? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |